Breaking News on Supplements, Health & Nutrition - Europe US edition | APAC edition

Read more breaking news


UK ASA ruling

‘You, stronger?’ Not via EU-approved protein-recovery claims, ASA tells MaxiNutrition

1 comment

By Shane Starling+

Last updated on 17-Jul-2014 at 10:07 GMT2014-07-17T10:07:04Z

Jabbed: ASA tells GSK to take its protein claims medicine ball and go home
Jabbed: ASA tells GSK to take its protein claims medicine ball and go home

The UK advertising watchdog has dropped a barbell on drug giant GlaxoSmithKline’s MaxiNutrition sports nutrition brand over “exaggerated” use of EU-approved protein-recovery claims.

GSK-MaxiNutrition is the latest firm to feel the wrath of the Advertising Standards Authority’s (ASA) increasingly stringent interpretation of EU health claim laws. In this case the TV advert had been OK’d by the broadcast advisor, Clearcast. An increasing number of observers are saying the rulings would not stand legal scrutiny as many of the censored claims are so close to approved EU claims under the nutrition and health claims regulation (NHCR).

MaxiNutrition was diplomatic in its response, stating: “The protein in our products has been scientifically proven to help grow and maintain muscles and our advertising was based on these EU approved health benefit claims. The term ‘muscle recovery’ is a widely used  expression of these EU approved protein health claims, and is commonly used by the sports food industry.”

One observer said the ASA ruling meant little to firms as by the time they came in, the campaigns had already run their course and made their impact with consumers.

“It’s got its millions of views so goal achieved,” the observer told us.

“Nothing happens to the business following an ASA ruling of this kind unless it is a more serious case, apart from the industry learning what to do next.”

The approved EU claims  state protein can contribute to the ‘growth and maintenance of muscle mass’.

Recovery v performance; protein v product

The ASA acknowledged claim wording could and should be flexible but said MaxiNutrition pushed the borderline between performance and recovery too far with claims like, "MaxiNutrition ... helping make you stronger and perform better." and, "MaxiNutrition. You, stronger."

It added: “…we considered the presentation of the claim, ‘MaxiNutrition proteins aid muscle recovery’ attributed muscle recovery to the product alone, rather than to protein in general.”

With the accompanying boxing imagery and muscular microscopy the agency concluded the claims, were not likely to have the same meaning for consumers as that of the authorised health claims and that the ads exaggerated the health benefit of the product.”

Call for consumer data

Dr Mark J Tallon, managing director of UK Food Law consultancy Legal Foods, pointed out ASA opinions were not legally binding.

“The ASA’s opinion is no more valid than that of the food business,” Dr Tallon said.

“However, if a company accepts that the ASA are a legitimate arbiter of the health claims regulation – despite having no force in the legal enforcement of the regulation – then they should provide not only a defense based on the scope and nuances of the regulation but also support their interpretation of the official wording of a health claim with data.”

“As far as we are aware no company has provide such data – e.g. a consumer survey – and as such this leaves the ASA to make any interpretation it wishes over the wording of a ‘flexed' health claim.”

He added: “As businesses become increasingly aware of the rigid interpretation the NHCR taken by the ASA and its incorporation into the [advertising] code they must now consider what evidence they hold to defend such a claim, be it legal, consumer based or other.”

“Similarly, working in close harmony with their local trading standards officer either under a home or primary authority can also afford additional protections."

The ASA ruling is here .

1 comment (Comments are now closed)

A Toothless Lion

Dr Tallon is correct. Despite calling itself an ‘Authority’ the ASA is just a Limited Company with no powers of enforcement under law. If GlaxoSmithKline have lost income by being placed on the ‘ASA’s Naughty List’ they could look to recover such loss from the ASA. I would pay to watch that case!

Report abuse

Posted by Peter Carter
16 July 2014 | 18h392014-07-16T18:39:26Z

Related products

Live Supplier Webinars

Polyphenols tipped to become the way to innovate in Sports Nutrition
Alpha & Omega in Sports Nutrition – Using Omega 3’s and A-GPC to improve performance and recovery.
KD Pharma
Orally bioavailable standardized botanical derivatives in sport nutrition: special focus on recovery in post-intense physical activities
Collagen in motion: move freely and keep your injuries in check
Leading manufacturer of gelatine and collagen peptides
Life’s too short for slow proteins. Whey proteins hydrolysates: Fast delivery for enhanced performance
Arla Foods Ingredients
What it Takes to Compete and Win in Today’s Sports Nutrition Market
Sports Nutrition Snapshot: Key regional drivers and delivery format innovations
William Reed Business Media
Gutsy performance: How can microbiome modulation help athletes and weekend warriors
William Reed Business Media
Pushing the boundaries: Where’s the line between ‘cutting edge nutrition’ and doping
William Reed Business Media

On demand Supplier Webinars

High-amylose maize starch may reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes: what does this qualified health claim mean?
Balancing Innovation and Risk in Sports Nutrition Ingredients
Explaining bio-hacking: is there a marketing opportunity for food companies?
William Reed Business Media
Personalized Nutrition – how an industry can take part in shaping the future of Nutrition
BASF Nutrition & Health
Find out Nutritional and ingredient lifecycle solutions and strategies!
Is the time rIpe for I-nutrition?
William Reed Business Media
The Advantage of Outsourcing Fermentation-based Manufacturing Processes
Evonik Health Care
All supplier webinars