Imaginative omega 3 solutions: Incromega™ 3mulsion DHA
Croda Europe
The two professors - Dr Moritz Hagenmeyer and Dr Andreas Hahn – proposed the claim: “Regular consumption of significant amounts of water can reduce the risk of development of dehydration and of concomitant decrease of performance.”
Speaking to NutraIngredients, Dr Hagenmeyer admitted the article 14 disease reduction claim could also test the limits of the regulation, and said he, Dr Hahn and others were looking into the legal ramifications of the rejection by the European Food Safety Authority’s health claims panel.
“The opinion is not convincing,” he said.
Disease risk reduction versus disease risk factor reduction
“I think what our application shows – and EFSA’s response - is the confusion that exists about disease risk reduction and disease risk factor reduction,” Dr Hagenmeyer said. “Perhaps that is why it took EFSA 2.5 years to deal with this submission because they didn’t know how to rule on it. But we will be submitting comments to the Commission in the 30-day period and we would appreciate any other interested parties to do the same.”
“Of course we are not optimistic because we have written to the European Commission’s Basil Mathioudakis and the signs are not good, but we will see.”
Water-dehydration
After dialogue with EFSA’s Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies to clarify the disease risk reduction factors, the professors proposed, “water loss in tissues” or “reduced water content in tissues” as risk factors in the development of dehydration.
But the Panel found these were, “measures of water depletion and thus are measures of the disease (dehydration).”
It therefore concluded: “…the proposed claim does not comply with the requirements for a disease risk reduction claim pursuant to [the NHCR].”
The opinion can be found here.
2 comments (Comments are now closed)
And we pay their salaries
That these guys are idiots is not really new. What really bothers me is that we pay tons of money for their idiocracy. Anyway, this is Europe, so what's new?
Report abuse
Posted by Laszlo G Meszaros
02 March 2011 | 13h54
Idiots savants
Sad - but not surprising - to see EFSA making a fool of itself again. Their faulty risk assessment models, which do to take into account the risks of NOT fortifying currently inadequate dietary patterns, serve nobody's interests other than the pharma industry. Their inability to deal in a sensible way with the water claim beautifully - and tragically - illustrates the inadequacy of their conceptual framework.
Report abuse
Posted by PaulC
28 February 2011 | 21h56