Breaking News on Supplements, Health & Nutrition - Europe US edition | APAC edition

Trends > Probiotics

Probiotics ban leads to marketing revolution

By Rick Pendrous , 10-Aug-2012
Last updated on 10-Aug-2012 at 09:43 GMT2012-08-10T09:43:09Z

Probiotic yogurt makers are reviewing their marketing

Probiotic yogurt makers are reviewing their marketing

Probiotic yogurt brands and supermarket own-label equivalents are leading a revolution in marketing of these products in advance of a ban, which comes into effect in December.

Manufacturers of all products, which have traditionally made health claims, will need to find clever ways of differentiating them from others on supermarket shelves come December when the number of health claims that can legally be made will be dramatically cut.

Manufacturers will have to reformulate and fortify their products or use clever marketing to capitalise on the health claims that have been approved, according to Dominic Watkins, a senior associate with legal firm DWF and an expert in health and nutrition.

From December, only those 222 general, article 13.1 ‘general function’ health claims that were approved by the EU earlier this year will be permissible. And most of these relate to minerals and vitamins in foods, such as calcium and vitamin C.

This will have a big impact for products, such as those using ‘superfood’, antioxidant claims and on probiotic yogurts, which have not been approved.

Implied claims

From December the term ‘probiotic’ will not be allowed on product packs, said Watkins. There is also intense debate about whether the use of probiotic bacterial strain names will be allowed either, he added, since these could be argued to constitute an ‘implied claim’.

“One of the biggest challenges about the regulation is understanding the breadth of what is and is not a health claim,” said Watkins. “In those scenarios one could see Trading Standards thinking, well maybe that is an implied claim. But there is a requirement [on labelling] to be specific about what the ingredients are so that the consumer is not mislead. And there is potentially a conflict there.”

Those involved in the probiotic field are still hopeful of eventually getting a health claim submission approved by the European Food Safety Authority’s panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA).

But until such time as probiotics win approval – which Watkins doubted would be for another two years – manufacturers and retailers would be left with no option but to make use of reformulation or other clever marketing to retain their business, he said.

Probiotic ad campaigns dropped

Already, he said, some well-known branded probiotic yogurt manufacturers had changed their advertising campaigns to focus on attributes other than the probiotic content.

Watkins also noted that supermarkets, such as Tesco, had discreetly responded to the changing regulatory environment.

Retailers had changed the focus of their marketing over the past year, he said, for example, own-label yogurt drinks had been rebranded to focus on other permissible health, nutrition and ‘natural’ benefits, which would not be in contravention of the rules.

“You will end up with a period of time where people will inevitably consider reformulation with things that have got approved health claims, for example, fortification with vitamins and minerals,” said Watkins.

EFSA guidance

To help manufacturers meet the specific requirements of the NDA panel, EFSA has just published further guidance on making health claims. It includes two documents advising on how manufacturers can justify health claims for their products when seeking approval.

They are the last two in a series of six which had already covered claims related to gut and immune function; antioxidants and cardiovascular health; weight management; and bone, joints and oral health.

Issues addressed in the documents include definitions of ‘beneficial physiological effects’ and the type of evidence that will be required to substantiate a claim.

EFSA has also just completed a further assessment of 13.1 claims, which covers most types of health claims for products. This dealt a further blow to the probiotics industry by rejecting digestive and vaginal health claims for nine individual strains of Lactobacillus probiotics.

Related products

Live Supplier Webinars

Polyphenols tipped to become the way to innovate in Sports Nutrition
Orally bioavailable standardized botanical derivatives in sport nutrition: special focus on recovery in post-intense physical activities
Collagen in motion: move freely and keep your injuries in check
Leading manufacturer of gelatine and collagen peptides
Life’s too short for slow proteins. Whey proteins hydrolysates: Fast delivery for enhanced performance
Arla Foods Ingredients
What it Takes to Compete and Win in Today’s Sports Nutrition Market
Sports Nutrition Snapshot: Key regional drivers and delivery format innovations
William Reed Business Media
Gutsy performance: How can microbiome modulation help athletes and weekend warriors
William Reed Business Media
Pushing the boundaries: Where’s the line between ‘cutting edge nutrition’ and doping
William Reed Business Media
Alpha & Omega in Sports Nutrition – Using Omega 3’s and A-GPC to improve performance and recovery.
KD Pharma

On demand Supplier Webinars

High-amylose maize starch may reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes: what does this qualified health claim mean?
Balancing Innovation and Risk in Sports Nutrition Ingredients
Explaining bio-hacking: is there a marketing opportunity for food companies?
William Reed Business Media
Personalized Nutrition – how an industry can take part in shaping the future of Nutrition
BASF Nutrition & Health
Find out Nutritional and ingredient lifecycle solutions and strategies!
Is the time rIpe for I-nutrition?
William Reed Business Media
The Advantage of Outsourcing Fermentation-based Manufacturing Processes
Evonik Health Care
All supplier webinars