SUBSCRIBE

Breaking News on Supplements & Nutrition - EuropeUS edition

Report abuse about a comment

Its not EFSA's fault

EFSA had to follow the instructions given by the EC. Therefore, the type of assessment of 13.1 claims was not chosen by EFSA and they cannot be blamed for harsh evaluation criteria of 13.1 claims.

Secondly, the unfair part, in my view, was the "applying of two different kinds of measures" for 13.1 claims: the vitamins/minerals claims were accepted based on text book knowledge, whereas other nutrients were evaluated based on intervention studies, although text book knowledge exists for them.

Many vitamins and minerals would have not won claims based on gold standard clinical trial evidence. To a great extent, the evidence for vit/mins resulted from deficiency epidemics. Ethically, such conditions cannot be used in todays clinical trial settings.

Hence, many 13.1 claims were evaluated as described in Art 15-18 and others were not.

In conclusion, I do not think that the evaluation of the 13.1 claims was consistent.

Posted by Dr. Christiane Alexander
19 March 2012 | 11h43

Please fill in the box below to tell us why you feel the post breaks our rules. When you are finished, click on "Send" so that it can be reviewed by a moderator.

Your name *
Your email *

We will not publish your email on the site

Reason *

Back to: Irish MEP: “We have opened a can of worms that EFSA and the Commission would have much preferred remained closed”

Spotlight

Fancy writing about the European food and nutrition industry? We’re hiring!
News in brief

Fancy writing about the European food and nutrition industry? We’re hiring!

Do you like breaking news in multiple formats? Are you comfortable interviewing a CEO or Greenpeace protestor,...

Omega-3 article retracted after suspicions raised on author

Why fish oil fails: Omega-3 review retracted after suspicions raised about author

A peer-reviewed journal has pulled a panning review of omega-3 benefits as concerns about its author's conflicts...

Tainted science? Microbiome studies may be ‘flawed’ by contamination

Tainted science? Microbiome studies may be ‘flawed’ by contamination

Researchers may be incorrectly linking certain microbes to the microbiota and disease states because of laboratory contamination,...

Holding up RCTs as 'gold standard' of research is a false hope and conceals statistical pitfalls, experts say

Holding up RCTs as 'gold standard' of research is a false hope and conceals statistical pitfalls, experts say

Randomized, placebo-controlled trials are a straitjacket for nutritional science, making FTC’s hardening stance an increasing burden on...

Time for a vitamin E intake rethink? Emerging data builds argument
Academic: "Anybody who thinks the world’s malnutrition problems are going to be solved without industry is dreaming."

Time for a vitamin E intake rethink? Emerging data builds argument

Emerging research linking vitamin E deficiency with increased risk of Alzheimer’s, miscarriages and fatty liver disease can...

Folic acid EFSA health claim for neural tube defect risk reduction

Game changer? Folic acid wins EFSA health claim for neural tube defect risk reduction

A newly approved EU health claim to say folic acid supplements reduce the risk of infant neural...

Key Industry Events

 

Access all events listing

Our events, Events from partners...