Increased intake of flavonols from tea and other sources may boost heart health for older women, with...
|
The UK Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has slapped a ban on the broadcast of a Yakult TV...
|
All the latest news and tweets live from the show
The NutraIngredients team is reporting live from the key industry event all week. We will be sharing...
|
Live from Vitafoods Europe 2013
Gunter Haesaerts
President, Pharmatoka
|
Guest article
Now that the dust has settled on the health claims submission process we should all be very...
|
Dosage recommendations for vitamin D supplementation in infancy do not help to raise levels to those considered...
|
Too myopic
This is what happens when we investigate a single nutrient without considering the essential co-factors needed for that nutrient to do its job. Absolutely calcium will cause problems without adequate K2, D3, magnesium and other minerals. Women have been told to take calcium for decades, but it's just recently we realized that, whoops, without D3 there may be absorption problems. Those are just 2 pieces of a much more complicated puzzle. And maybe, just maybe, we really don't need that much calcium, but this is more a reflection of the co-factor deficiencies. After all, women in other industrialized countries don't pound down the calcium supplements like American women and we've got some of the highest rates of osteoporosis - and heart disease. Go figure...
Posted by Lori
14 February 2013 | 18h12