EU nutrient profiles: The 9-year saga

EU Parliament could ask Commission to ditch nutrient profiles for health claims

By Annie Harrison-Dunn contact

- Last updated on GMT

ENVI vote for nutrient profiles to be 'eliminated'; Committee on Legal Affairs to vote next week
ENVI vote for nutrient profiles to be 'eliminated'; Committee on Legal Affairs to vote next week

Related tags: Nutrient profiles, Nutrition, European union

Key European Parliament committee votes could push the European Commission to “eliminate” nutrient profiles from the 2006 nutrition and health claims regulation (NHCR).

Nutrient profiles were written into the NHCR, the idea being that health claims should only be applied to foods that fit a certain nutrition profile, i.e. not high in fat, sugar or salt. Nine years on and the Commission is yet to establish these profiles, leaving some European Parliament committees to question whether the condition should be scrapped.

The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI) voted for this in March and next week the Committee on Legal Affairs will have its say. 

The votes came as part of the Regulatory Fitness and Performance Programme (REFIT), which sought to refine EU regulations and reduce red tape.

In March, ENVI voted 50 to 18 to amend a paragraph which explicitly sought to strike the condition from the regulation. The paragraph called on the Commission to, if appropriate, “eliminate the concept of nutrient profiles”.

The redrafted opinion as a whole was voted in 62 votes in favour, 0 against and 6 abstentions. It said the purpose of informing consumers on fat, sugar and salt content had since been fulfilled by other regulation, namely the Food Information for Consumers (FIC) Regulation​ which came into force last year.

The 2006 nutrition and health claims regulation​ read:

“The application of nutrient profiles as a criterion would aim to avoid a situation where nutrition or health claims mask the overall nutritional status of a food product, which could mislead consumers when trying to make healthy choices in the context of a balanced diet.

"Nutrient profiles as provided for in this Regulation should be intended for the sole purpose of governing the circumstances in which claims may be made. They should be based on generally accepted scientific evidence relative to the relationship between diet and health. However, profiles should also allow for product innovation and should take into account the variability of dietary habits and traditions, and the fact that individual products may have an important role in the context of an overall diet.”

The redrafted opinion also called for the Commission to “review the scientific basis of this [health claim] regulation and how useful and realistic it is”​ given the “serious and persistent problems” ​with its implementation including problems of distorted competition.

ENVI’s suggestions were passed onto the Legal Affairs Committee, which will have its own vote on 16th​ June with a motion for a resolution to be voted in the July plenary session of the Parliament in Strasbourg, France, in its 14-17th​ July sitting.

While these two votes don’t have the power to strike nutrient profiles from the regulation they will be heard as a significant call for action by the Commission, a spokesperson for the Commission told us.

Nutrient profile backing

However, not everyone was calling for the profiles to be deleted. UK Labour MEP and ENVI committee member Glenis Willmott said she, along with the other members of the EU group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D), voted against the idea in March.

“Rather than calling for these to be scrapped, we should be demanding that the Commission comes forward with these nutrient profiles as soon as possible so as to ensure that consumers are not being misled,"​ she told NutraIngredients.

Willmott said nutrient profiles would ensure food could not be marketed as healthy when in reality it was high in fat or sugar, for example a sugary cereal fortified with vitamins and iron. At the time she said "ongoing heavy lobbying from the food industry"​ meant many people had misunderstood what nutrient profiles were meant to be.

Glenis-Willmott-MEP
Glenis Willmott MEP: Opposes nutrient profiles being scrapped

She hoped Parliament would "reject this unhelpful amendment".

The European Consumer Organisation (BEUC) has also been campaigning this year for the Commission to push forward with the project and warned that the REFIT programme should not jeopardise regulation designed to protect consumers from spurious claims. The Brussels-based group said the failure to set the promised profiles had seen firms using fortification as a ‘health halo’ over unhealthy foods.

The REFIT programme is part of European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker’s ‘better regulation’ agenda, which seeks to rationalise and streamline EU cross-sector law making.

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

Tipping the Scales for Healthy Weight

Tipping the Scales for Healthy Weight

Despite the current health and wellness craze, weight gain and obesity continue to rise. Whether a person gains or loses weight is a basic equation of...

Fermented Soy for Natural Digestive Support

Fermented Soy for Natural Digestive Support

Lallemand Bio-Ingredients | 22-Apr-2019 | Technical / White Paper

Lallemand is running a new clinical trial for Gastro-AD® in spring 2019. Gastro-AD® is a clinically studied food supplement based on non-GMO soy fermented...

MenaQ7® Partners Benefit From K2 Outreach

MenaQ7® Partners Benefit From K2 Outreach

NattoPharma USA, Inc. | 22-Apr-2019 | Case Study

MenaQ7® K2 as MK-7 provides health benefits for all ages. That is a fact clinically proven by NattoPharma and communicated to practitioners and consumers...

Related suppliers

Follow us

Featured Events

View more

Products

View more

Webinars