SUBSCRIBE

Breaking News on Supplements & Nutrition - EuropeUS edition

On your radar > Health claims

It’s official! There are 222 general function approved health claims in the EU; 1500+ rejected

2 commentsBy Shane Starling , 14-Dec-2012
Last updated on 17-Dec-2012 at 16:52 GMT

It’s official! There are 222 approved EU health claims

From today food and supplement products marketed in the EU’s 27 member states must comply with the article 13, permitted list of health claims or face prosecution for misleading marketing.

Ingredients companies, brand owners, trade groups, member state regulatory bodies and other groups have been scrambling to become compliant and understand the grey areas that exist in the EU nutrition and health claims regulation (NHCR) such as the status of B2B communications.

“Only permitted health claims featuring on the list and those which are still under consideration by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) can be used on food packaging across the EU,” the European Commission said.

“The list of permitted claims will protect EU consumers against misleading claims and will ensure a level playing field for food business operators. The priority now is to finalise the review of all health claims submitted for evaluation to EFSA which were put 'on hold' when establishing the list of permitted health claims.”

No black and white

The Brussels-based trade group and ardent NHCR critic, the European Responsible Nutrition Alliance (ERNA), has today issued a 68-page guidance to assist companies in the health claims area that is freely available for download on its website.

 “Given the complexity of the legislation and the room for interpretation left, it is not possible in all cases to provide black and white answers,” it states.

“This guidance therefore intends to offer to food operators the necessary elements for making a reasoned judgment when using a specific claim and to develop sound arguments to support the approach chosen.”

December 14 EU healtUK advertising watchdog and EU trade group issue health claims guidance

US perspective

Steve Mister, the president and CEO of the US Council for Responsible Nutrition (CRN) told us the situation in Europe was very much on his group’s radar.

 “Our members have been reviewing their product labels and are prepared to fully comply. Even as our companies are preparing to comply with this new regulation, we will continue to believe that the process that EFSA used discounts a great deal of valuable nutrition science.

“Moving forward, we will continue our efforts to convince EFSA to accept a broader range of evidence in support of health claims for our products.”

Stricter, more specific

In the UK, the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) made it clear that today heralds a much stricter era for healthy food marketeers.

14 December is the day for the key changes to the regulatory framework for food advertising to come fully into force,” the agency said.

“Although there are still interim procedures and transitional periods in place, there will be significant changes to how the ASA approaches health claims made in advertising for food products from this date onwards.

“The onus is on advertisers to ensure that they are aware of any particular transitional period which may apply to any specific claims they may wish to make.”

It added: “Any general health claims in an ad will need to be accompanied by a specific authorised health claim. ‘General health claim’ is likely to have a fairly wide interpretation; it will not just apply to claims such as ‘healthy’ and ‘good for you’, but also claims like ‘superfood’.”

“This requirement is stricter than the previous position when advertisers were required to hold evidence for such general claims because it requires that the specific authorised health claim is stated in the advertising copy.”

The official register of approved and rejected claims can be found here .

Subscribe to our FREE newsletter

Get FREE access to authoritative breaking news, videos, podcasts, webinars and white papers. SUBSCRIBE

2 comments (Comments are now closed)

Health Claim

It is clear that our governments are "claiming" to defining 'health claims' without any understanding of health, the document even says "‘Health’ is not defined in the NHCR." - and then references the WHO definition of health, which is clearly a flawed and incomplete definition, not useful for measurement of healthiness.

We need a definition of health that facilitates measurement. Until we learn to measure healthiness - the definition of "health claims" will be flawed..
Everyone has a right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of healthiness.

Report abuse

Posted by Tracy Kolenchuk, founder Healthicine.org
02 January 2013 | 17h24

Prebiotics

It's interesting to note that 3 days ago there was a Nutraingredients article extolling the virtues of prebiotics, which would likely not be permitted under the new regulations.
http://www.nutraingredients.com/Industry/Prebiotics-boost-gut-health-while-adding-functionality

Report abuse

Posted by Peter Olins
14 December 2012 | 15h31