Folate fortification linked to lower colon cancer risk

By Stephen Daniells

- Last updated on GMT

Related tags: Folic acid

Folate fortification linked to lower colon cancer risk
Increased intakes of folate following the introduction of fortification in the US was associated with a reduction in the incidence of colorectal cancer, says a new analysis.

Data collected over the course of about nine years from over 525,000 people following the introduction of folic acid fortification in the US revealed that people with the highest folate levels were 30% less likely to develop colorectal cancer.

Findings published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition​ go some way to confirming the additional health benefits of folic acid fortification, introduced in the US in 1998.

However, researchers from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) note that colorectal cancer has a long latency period of between 10 and 20 years, and that additional follow-up time is required before firm conclusions can be drawn. The latency period is the time between the first exposure to a cancer-causing agent and the clinical recognition of the disease.

Benefits for babies

An overwhelming body of evidence links has linked folate deficiency in early pregnancy to increased risk of neural tube defects (NTD) - most commonly spina bifida and anencephaly - in infants.

The first country to fortify flour on a national scale with folic acid – the synthetic, bioavailable form of folate – was Oman, which introduced this in 1996. The US and Canada followed in 1998. Preliminary evidence indicates that the measure is having an effect with a reported 15 to 50 per cent reduction in NTD incidence.

A total of 51 countries now have some degree of mandatory fortification of flour with folic acid.

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently listed the prevention of neural tube defects through flour fortification amongst its list of 10 great health achievements in the US for the last decade.

Study details

The NIH scientists analysed data from 525,488 individuals aged between 50 and 71 participating in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study.

Results showed that over a period of about nine years, 7,212 people developed colorectal cancer, 6,484 of which occurred after the introduction of fortification. For people with the highest average intakes of folate/folic acid (at least 900 micrograms per day) the risk of colorectal cancer was 30 % lower than in people with the lowest average intakes (less than 200 micrograms per day).

In addition, the highest intakes specifically from supplements or the diet were associated with 18% and 19% reductions, respectively.

Contradictory results

Concerns that folic acid – the synthetic form of folate – may increase the risk of colorectal cancer have surfaced over recent years, with some experts noting that folic acid, and not folate, may promote the formation of cancers under select circumstances where a person may already have a pre-cancerous or cancerous tumour.

This has led to some finger pointing at the synthetic form of the vitamin. On passage through the intestinal wall, folic acid is converted to 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, the naturally circulating form of folate. However, some studies have suggested that oral intake of folic acid in high doses may overwhelm this conversion pathway, leading to measurable levels of folic acid in the blood (Nutrition Reviews​, 2009, Vol 67, pp. 206-212).

However, a recent analysis of data from almost 100,000 men and women from the American Cancer Society indicated that increased intakes of folic acid from fortified foods and dietary supplements are not linked to an increased risk of colorectal cancer (Gastroenterology​, doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2011.04.004).

Source: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published online ahead of print, doi: 10.3945/​ajcn.110.002659
“Pre- and postfortification intake of folate and risk of colorectal cancer in a large prospective cohort study in the United States”
Authors: T.M. Gibson, S.J. Weinstein, R.M. Pfeiffer, A.R. Hollenbeck, A.F. Subar, A. Schatzkin, S.T. Mayne, R. Stolzenberg-Solomon

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

Pycnogenol® Provides Benefits for Men Managing ED

Pycnogenol® Provides Benefits for Men Managing ED

Horphag Research | 17-Feb-2020 | Clinical Study

Newly published research shows daily supplementation with Pycnogenol® can strengthen erectile function and address common conditions related to type 2...

HRB are ideal probiotics for human health

HRB are ideal probiotics for human health

Morinaga Milk Industry Co., Ltd. | 13-Jan-2020 | Technical / White Paper

Evidence is accumulated that the physiological benefits of probiotics bifidobacteria are not only strain-specific but also dependent on their residential...

Vitamins & Minerals as Nature intended

Vitamins & Minerals as Nature intended

LEHVOSS Nutrition | 12-Dec-2019 | Data Sheet

LEHVOSS Nutrition offer a range of natural, organic certified, vegan and active vitamins and minerals. These are offered as “whole-food complexes” in their...

Related suppliers

1 comment

Cost-benfits of FA fortification

Posted by John Nichols,

I have just completed a study that predicts that fortification here in the UK should save £5.1 million/year. This would be just in savings from averted NTD maformations and associated costs to the UK National Health Service. Should we now think about other savings with this new evidence? - too soon, I suspect!

Report abuse

Follow us

Featured Events

View more

Products

View more

Webinars