“Try telling any marathoner or endurance cyclist that carb drinks and gels don't help them maintain performance over long distances and you'll be laughed out of the room..."

‘Controversial’; EFSA rejects sports gels for endurance


- Last updated on GMT

Endurance athletes like professional cyclists swear by sports gels - EFSA has failed to back their efficacy
Endurance athletes like professional cyclists swear by sports gels - EFSA has failed to back their efficacy

Related tags Nutrition Glucose

Data backing ‘carbohydrate solutions’ like sports gels to benefit 60-minute-plus endurance efforts have been rebuffed by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), a decision one sports nutrition expert called, “controversial”.

The dossier, submitted by the British Specialist Nutrition Association (BSNA), contained three meta-analyses relating to 195 human intervention studies but no individual clinical trials were presented.

In handing down its verdict​ EFSA’s Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) noted an article 13.1 general function positive opinion​ from 2011 that backed carbohydrate-electrolyte beverages to maintain, “endurance performance” ​under the EU nutrition and health claims regulation (NHCR).

Here the difference was that the solution (such as a gel) was purely carbohydrate-based and also that the comparative product – water or water/electrolyte placebo – was undefined. The NDA said it requested data on “the comparator”​ but none was forthcoming from the BSNA.

Without a valid point of comparison, the panel proceeded to reject the endurance claim for, “carbohydrate solutions [that] contain 50–80 g/L (or 200-320 kcal/L) of carbohydrates that induce high glycaemic responses (e.g. glucose, glucose polymers, sucrose) and include sports 'gels' (to be consumed with water) containing 20–70 g of carbohydrates/100 g.”

BSNA director general Roger Clarke told us his group and its members associated with the application were assessing the decision to, determine ‘next steps’ within the timeframe given.”

It has 30 days to appeal the decision.

Dropped the ball?

Mark Gilbert, co-founder, sports nutritionist and chief content officer at UK-based MuscleGenes.com, said there was, “decades of data”​ backing the role of carbohydrates in endurance activities.

The NDA opinion was therefore, “yet another controversial EFSA decision considering that an average man could hold as little as 150 g of carbohydrate – or less – as glycogen in his muscles, depending upon his diet and exercise activity.”

Mark Gilbert-Musclegenes

Gilbert said even someone on a high-carb diet could burn through available glycogen stores in 40 minutes or less, “So I'm not sure how anyone can get around this scenario without suggesting carb repletion.”

“Try telling any marathoner or endurance cyclist that carb drinks and gels don't help them maintain performance over long distances and you'll be laughed out of the room and never invited back!”

“So I can't for the life of me explain how EFSA has dropped the ball yet again when making decisions on sports nutrition/supplements.”

He added: “Do they fear these messages will be delivered to non-exercisers, thus causing excess sugar intake in the general population/children?... or is EFSA only considering typical bouts of activity and not intense exercise or prolonged exercise.”

Lessons to be learnt

Dr Adam Carey, chair of the European Specialist Sports Nutrition Alliance (ESSNA), said the verdict was more about the application than the science backing carbohydrates and endurance.

Dr Adam Carey-ESSNA

“We understand EFSA reached the conclusion they did not because there is no science to support the claim, but because the right type of evidence was not presented as required by the claims approval process. This does not change the obvious fact  that athletes have increased energy requirements and carbohydrate gels are a great way to deliver on this need around training or competition. This is something that any regular runner will be able to tell you.

"We therefore believe that this opinion will have no negative impact, and the industry must learn the lesson from this process to ensure that the science they submit to support any potential claim in future is robust and well-founded.”

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

Optimize Nutritional Value with DuraLipo™

Optimize Nutritional Value with DuraLipo™

Content provided by INNOBIO Corporation Limited | 02-May-2024 | White Paper

INNOBIO's DuraLipo™ products encapsulates active ingredients within phospholipids, forming a genuine phospholipid bilayer structure.

Your expert partner in active nutrition solutions

Your expert partner in active nutrition solutions

Content provided by ADM | 30-Apr-2024 | Case Study

The intersection of the rising plant-based trend and increasing awareness of gut health has opened new opportunities for market success. Consumer demand...

Pycnogenol® for Sport: eNOS and Beyond

Pycnogenol® for Sport: eNOS and Beyond

Content provided by Horphag Research | 12-Apr-2024 | White Paper

Engaging in physical activities immediately triggers a number of physiological responses from our body (1). First, our liver glucose output and adipose...

Related suppliers


Show more

This topic is already covered by an EFSA health claim

Posted by Eric Chappuis,

EFSA has already issued a positive opiunion for CHO-E beverages and maintenance of endurance performance in 2011. The application here relates to carbohydrates alone (without electrolytes). When reading the EFSA opinion the application did not seem to be much substantiated with targeted science.

Report abuse

Unbeleivable !

Posted by Bleda,

Agrre with Max R. EFSA consists of people who has no clue about sports. And seems they never participated a sports activity ! Deciding about such issue sitting on a chair without having a real idea about sports ? Absolutely ridiculous ! I've been efficently using such carbs over 2 decades and cannot accept some ignorant authority to decide on such serious issue !

Report abuse

Seems pretty fair really

Posted by tony,

Sorry but you can't be peeved if you don't put in the proper paperwork!! Obviously gels can provide carbs for athletes, which in enduration situations can help, however, EFSA has to be able to show the correct scientific validation for any statement they put out. If the people who want the claim can't be arsed providing the science, that's their fault.

As an aside, swap over to fats, way better for endurance, and you don't need to carry a bundle of tooth rotting gels in your pocket ;)

Report abuse

Follow us


View more