NDA panellist: Angry academics would come to same conclusions if on our panel
![NDA panellist: Angry academics would come to same conclusions if on our panel](/var/wrbm_gb_food_pharma/storage/images/_aliases/wrbm_small/8/5/2/1/261258-1-eng-GB/NDA-panellist-Angry-academics-would-come-to-same-conclusions-if-on-our-panel.jpg)
The Professor in Nutrition and Biochemistry at the Medical school at the University of Lyon, who formerly advised the French Food Agency (ANSES) that approved both lutein-eye and cranberry-UTI claims, said the nutrition and health claims regulation (NHCR) was the culprit behind the ever-widening, researcher-NDA panel divide.
“A good researcher is not by the way a good expert and reciprocally a good expert is not necessarily the best researcher in the field,” professor Martin said. “It’s quite a different thing.”
“In research you have to address questions on your own, when you are an expert you have to answer a question that is posed by somebody else and you have to answer in a specific context and for the health claims it is the context of the regulation and you cannot ignore this context.”