Nestlé defends plant patenting as 300,000 protest

By Shane STARLING contact

- Last updated on GMT

Nestlé defends plant patenting as 300,000 protest

Related tags: Patent

Nestlé has affirmed its position in the face of an NGO-led petition begun in April that has won 331,500 signatures protesting the food firm's intentions for the nutrient-rich fennel flower.

“Nestlé is attempting to create a nigella sativa [fennelflower] monopoly and gain the ability to sue anyone using it without Nestlé’s permission,”​ the ‘SumofUs’ petition​ reads. 

The Swiss food giant said the monopoly accusations were unfounded.

“Nestlé is not trying to patent ​Nigella sativa,”​ the company said. “We applied for a patent to protect the use of molecules, which act on opioid receptors for treating or preventing food allergy.”

“This patent, which has not yet been approved, would not prevent the use of ​Nigella sativa for any other purposes, including traditional uses and natural remedies.”

Plant control?

The petition states that Nigella sativa ​could be used for, “nutritional interventions in humans with food allergy.”

“But instead of creating an artificial substitute, or fighting to make sure the remedy was widely available, Nestlé is attempting to create a nigella sativa monopoly and gain the ability to sue anyone using it without Nestlé’s permission.

“Don’t let Nestlé turn a traditional cure into a corporate cash cow.”

“If we act fast, we can put enough pressure on Nestlé to get it to drop its patent plans before they harm anyone - but if we want any chance at affecting Nestlé's decision, we have to speak out now!”

Nestlé said its patent applications stem from earlier research around allergies that had isolated a fennel molecule, thymoquinone.

It reiterated that if the patent was approved it realted only to that molecule and not the rest of the flower and plant.

The issue sparked massive debate online with. One online forum​ commentator, Peter Tar, related that a plant could not be patented in its natural state but, "...a natural substance that has never before been isolated or known may be patentable in some instances, but only in its isolated form,"​ could be.

"A variation of a naturally occurring substance may be patentable if an inventor is able to demonstrate substantial non-obvious modifications that offer significant advantages in using the variant."

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

Adulteration: Don’t Be Fooled, Know the Facts

Adulteration: Don’t Be Fooled, Know the Facts

Sabinsa: our innovation is your answer® | 09-Jul-2018 | Technical / White Paper

Increased knowledge and awareness of natural products has in turn increased their global demand. This well documented paper highlights various examples,...

How Polyphenols enhance probiotic benefits

How Polyphenols enhance probiotic benefits

BerryPharma® - the Expert in Berry Extracts | 17-Oct-2017 | Research Study

Researchers have recently identified the positive interactions between polyphenols and intestinal bacteria, leading to classification as a prebiotic function....

Related suppliers

2 comments

Really???

Posted by Kim Peterson,

The Pharma Giants did this with the "Red Yeast Rice"..the one chemical in it that has to be removed before you take it so there is no benefit. Stop this out of control power grab.

Report abuse

consumer

Posted by tracy mckee,

nestle as a company uses gmos in there staple food products...it is normal to make patents on seeds. if they can prove certain amounts of qualities of natural toxins,but not on a plant species..

Report abuse

Follow us

Featured Events

View more

Products

View more

Webinars