The bigger picture: Dietary fibre measurement method adopted globally

By Lynda Searby

- Last updated on GMT

The US joins Australia, New Zealand Canada and Europe in favouring CODEX definitions of dietary fibre, but UK remains out of sync.
The US joins Australia, New Zealand Canada and Europe in favouring CODEX definitions of dietary fibre, but UK remains out of sync.

Related tags Dietary fibre Dietary fiber

A test method pioneered by Irish diagnostic technology company Megazyme International has become the global method of choice for ensuring dietary fibre content is not 'double counted' on nutritional labels. 

The McCleary method, named after the company’s founder Barry McCleary, or the AOAC 2009.01 measures all components of dietary fibre, including resistant starch and non-digestible oligosaccharides. This avoids underestimates of dietary fibre values as well as ‘double counting’ - which can lead to inflated values.

Historically, food laboratories used the Prosky method (AOAC 985.29) for measuring dietary fibre. This uses bacterial α-amylase and harsh conditions (pH 8.2, 100°C) for the enzymatic incubation step - in which the sample is treated with enzymes that mimic the digestive process in the human small intestine. 

However, in 2009, when CODEX Alimentarius set a new definition for dietary fibre, which acknowledged that non-digestible oligosaccharides and resistant starch also behave physiologically as dietary fibre, it became apparent that this method may not always be the most accurate, Megazyme International said. 

The US is set to adopt the CODEX definition in 2016. 

A partial picture

As David Mangan, R&D manager with Megazyme, explained: “The Prosky method measures some components of dietary fibre in an incomplete fashion. Most resistant starch and all non-digestible oligosaccharides are excluded which results in an underestimation of dietary fibre in many food types.”

To be precise, galacto-oligosaccharides, raffinose and stachyose are not measured while polydextrose, resistant maltodextrins, inulin, fructooligosaccharides, pectin, arabinogalactan and resistant starch are partially measured. 

Double counting

Mangan said this posed a challenge for analysts because, if, for example, resistant starch was measured using AOAC 2002.02 and the value obtained was added to the total dietary fibre value calculated using the Prosky method, this would mean resistant starch was ‘double counted’, resulting in an artificially high dietary fibre value.

The McCleary method, on the other hand, measured all components of dietary fibre as defined by CODEX. It used pancreatic α-amylase and conditions much closer to physiological (pH 6 and 37°C) for the enzymatic incubation step.

“Under these gentler conditions, the resistant starch is not hydrolysed as it is with the Prosky method,”​ explained Mangan.

Non-digestible oligosaccharides are measured using HPLC (high performance liquid chromatography). 

Widespread acceptance

Many national and international authorities, among them the EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), Food Standards Australia and New Zealand (FSANZ) and Health Canada, have accepted the CODEX definition of dietary fibre and the accompanying analytical method AOAC 2009.01.

In the USA, the FDA has proposed to adopt the CODEX definition and accompanying analytical method AOAC 2009.01 in a rule change to 21 CFR part 101 that will come into effect in 2016.

The UK is the only country to use a completely different definition – based on the use of the non-starch polysaccharide (NSP) method - to measure fibre.

“It is unclear at this time whether the UK will take this opportunity to harmonise with the rest of the world in this regard,” ​said Mangan.

Megazyme is the only commercial supplier of the reagents required to run AOAC 2009.01, sold in the form of its ‘Integrated Total Dietary Fiber Assay Kit’. 

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

Whitepaper: Discover a new era in postbiotics

Whitepaper: Discover a new era in postbiotics

Content provided by DSM Nutritional Products | 28-Nov-2023 | White Paper

Postbiotic ingredients are set to open up a world of opportunities across the human health and nutrition industry, fueled by developing science demonstrating...

Custom Biotic Solutions for Digestive Health

Custom Biotic Solutions for Digestive Health

Content provided by ADM: Innovation that Feeds the Future | 10-Oct-2023 | White Paper

A growing body of evidence shows gut health can affect digestive health, well-being, and many health areas in between.

The Art of Organic Certification

The Art of Organic Certification

Content provided by FoodChain ID | 09-Oct-2023 | White Paper

The organic food market has experienced remarkable growth over the past decade, providing a major opportunity for food brands and manufacturers to tap...

Discover how to enhance ingredient functionality

Discover how to enhance ingredient functionality

Content provided by Lonza | 04-Oct-2023 | Product Brochure

Consumer demand for capsules shows no sign of slowing down—they are the globally preferred dosage form for 50% of consumers. But in an increasingly saturated...

Related suppliers

1 comment

Not Only AOAC2009.01

Posted by A Reader,

This article would be misunderstanding. The actual FDA proposal include not only AOAC2009.01 but also include other methods as "AOAC 2009.01, AOAC 2011.25 or an equivalent AOAC method of analysis as given in the Official Methods of Analysis of the AOAC International 19th Edition".

Report abuse

Follow us


View more